I was watching a live performance of "Unknown Pleasures" played by Deerhoof with Jamie Stewart of Xiu Xiu on vocals and it struck me -- when exactly did interpretations of Joy Division's by newer artists become more interesting than listening to Joy Division themselves? Don't get me wrong, the original recordings are still unassailable and essential. But somewhere along the way, the fallout from Joy Division's immense influence on at least two generations of musicians became more exciting than listening to "Closer" for the 10000th time.
Having a small back catalogue has a lot to do with it. JD only recorded two official albums and about 50 songs in total, and that's including the early Warsaw era songs and demos from the scrapped 1978 debut. There are only so many times you can comb over the same small pool of recordings before allowing them to breathe and live on via other artists. Listening to JD lacks new surprises, which happens with plenty of artists whose music I can imagine without needing to play the recordings. This doesn't always happen with legendary bands who had short careers, for instance, I don't feel the need to hear anyone attempt a Velvet Underground cover ever again. The Velvets explored more ground creatively, featured a few vocalists with very different styles, and they were further ahead of their time than just about any band ever was. There's a lot more to chew on. JD evolved quickly during the short time they had and the future directions were obviously there (e.g. "Heart and Soul", not to mention everything New Order did). It's past time to hear more bands' take on their material -- aren't JD a bit "under-covered" for a band of their stature anyway?
Something changed post-Factory when New Order moved to London Records and received the full re-release/re-packaging treatment, finally getting their careers and discographies on a solid financial (and archival) footing. Fans who grew up idolizing them became music writers, and they went from being indie cult darlings on the level of the Jam to appearing on the shortlists of the best all-time British groups. Is "Love Will Tear Us Apart" the greatest single ever, as this list from NME from 2002 attests? Regardless, it would have been inconceivable to see this in a major music publication even ten years earlier.
That idolization eventually played itself out. JD worship in 2018 is like Beatles worship in 2008. It's amazing to think that the Beatles and JD played their last notes together only ten years apart because their music seems like separated by one or two generations. Even in 2000, when the Beatles' "1" was the top selling album, it felt like everything that needed to be said about them had been said. We're nearly a decade on from that in the JD timeline, and it's been 23 years since the release of the retrospective compilation, "Permanent". Is it any wonder that we're all so burned out?
It's possible that I reverse my opinion when I get around to Peter Hook's JD autobiography, which I bought some time ago but haven't yet begun reading ...
2 comments:
Did you listen to Peter Hook & The Light playing the two "Substance" compilations? I also had the impression that the new versions were more interesting than the old originals. Two reasons the music still works for me. Firstly those are magnificent songs, secondly a new take on them highlights their power even more. Here are four songs and an interview with Hooky.
I've heard the JD stuff, but not the NO "Substance". He formed The Light to re-imagine and update the JD material, I thought he was filling an interesting niche there. But once he extended the concept to 80's NO then it started feeling like a cash grab and a way to get some revenge on the other members of NO for carrying on without him. Shame about Hooky's singing though (which I have never liked) because musically The Light are a great band.
Post a Comment